WanSaiful.com

Personal thoughts of Wan Saiful Wan Jan

Angkatan Amanah Merdeka (Amanah)

Banyak pihak yang tertarik dengan berita penubuhan Angkatan Amanah Merdeka (Amanah). Ada juga yang mengatakan bahawa setelah sekian lama menunggu, akhirnya Tengku Razaeleigh Hamzah kini mula bangkit untuk mmenyatakan pandangan, seterusnya memimpin sebuah pergerakan nasional yang sekian lama dinanti-nantikan.

Lihat contoh ulasan di sini:
1. The Star (21 Julai 2011)
2. The Malaysian Insider (20 Julai 2011)
3. Free Malaysia Today (19 Julai 2011)
4. Malaysia Today (19 Julai 2011)
5. Abnmulya blog
6. Sayuti Omar Blog

… dan banyak lagi.

Kebanyakan ulasan ini adalah berdasarkan kenyataan yang saya keluarkan untuk menjemput media ke majlsi pelancaran Amanah pada Jumaat 22 Julai di Memorial Tunku Abdul Rahman. Saya tampalkan kenyataan tersebut di bawah.

Keahlian Amanah terbuka kepada semua individu, tanpa mengira kaum atau agama. Kami tidak mengira parti politik mana yang anda sertai, tetapi kami mengalu-alukan semua individu yang berkongsi keyakinan terhadap Amanah Merdeka Bapa Malaysia seperti yang dinyatakan di bawah. Secara kebetulan visi ini rupanya dikongsi oleh mereka daripada pelbagai latarbelakang politik.

Maka barisan kepimpinan yang akan diumumkan esok di majlis pelancaran akan terdiri daripada tokoh-tokoh veteran daripada pelbagai latarbelakang. Pihak media banyak yang terlalu menekankan kepelbagaian latar belakang politik ini, sehingga ada yang memberi gambaran seolah-olah di dalam Amanah akan ada wakil-wakil setiap parti politik. Ini tidak tepat.

Sudah pasti kami mengalu-alukan setiap tokoh daripada pelbagai parti. Saya gembira kerana media memberikan penekanan terhadap penyatuan pelbagai parti kerana ini melambangkan betapa mereka sendiri sudah muak dengan politik kepartian yang melampau yang kini semakin meluas. Tetapi yang lebih penting bagi Amanah ialah komitmen terhadap Amanat Merdeka Bapa Malaysia. Bukan keahlian dalam parti A atau parti B atau perwakilan “rasmi” daripada parti itu dan ini, seperti yang digambarkan oleh beberapa laporan media.

Ramai juga yang bertanya siapa lagi yang akan mengepalai Amanah. Semua ini akan diumumkan esok.

Kami menjemput semua individu untuk sama-sama menyertai Amanah. Saya amat berminat untuk bertemu mereka yang mahu mengusahakan penubuhan Amanah peringkat negeri atau kawasan.

Borang keahlian akan mula diedarkan esok di majlis pelancaran. Laman web kami juga akan mula beroperasi secepat mungkin.

Semua pembaca juga dijemput untuk hadir ke majlis pelancaran esok (maklumat lanjut di bawah)

—-

Kenyataan asal yang saya keluarkan pada 19 Julai kepada media untuk menjemput mereka membuat liputan majlis pelancaran Amanah:

Dear all,

I am pleased to let you know that YBM Tengku Tan Sri Razaleigh Hamzah will launch his new organisation – Angkatan Amanah Merdeka (Amanah) – on:
Date: Friday, 22 July 2011
Time: from 9.30am
Venue: Auditorium, Memorial Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra, Jalan Dato Onn, Kuala Lumpur

YBM Tengku Tan Sri Razaleigh Hamzah, as Founding President of Amanah, will deliver a keynote speech at this event.

We cordially invite you to cover this event. An invitation card is attached.

For further information, please contact:
Puan Khatijah (03 2148 5655)
Encik Vinesh (017 201 4507)
Encik Lukhman (012 204 6746)

The purpose of Angkatan Amanah Merdeka, or, in short, Amanah, is: “To reaffirm, to inculcate and to re-ignite the sense of togetherness and true family spirit that prevailed among all Malaysians during the time of our common struggle for national independence.”

We believe that it is important to revive the legacy of “AMANAT MERDEKA BAPA MALAYSIA” in accordance with the letter and spirit of the Constitution of Malaysia.

Tunku Abdul Rahman’s “Amanat Merdeka Bapa Malaysia” reads:

“If we really want to come together as a family and live under one roof called Malaysia, we must be sincere with one another – Malay, Chiense, Indian, Dayak, Kadazan, Siamese and others – Muslims, Budhists, Hindu, Christian, etc”

“If we are sincere then we cannot say anything that will hurt one another. We cannot also do anything that will hurt each other.”

“As sincere members of one family we must always be there to help one another. The rich must help the poor and the succesful must help the unfortunate. Only then can we become one people and a country that is united and strong. Everyone will be happy. Only then will Malaysia be respected by the world”

The mission of Amanah:

1. To rekindle the legacy, promise and ideals of Bapa Malaysia and the Founding Fathers so that all Malaysians may live together as members of a truly just, fair, progressive, united and happy national community

2. To earnestly acknowledge, affirm and respect the sovereignty of the constituent states of the Malaysian Federation, consistent with the principles of federalism, consistent with democratic principles and in true spirit of the Constitution

3. To ensure that our national institutions respect and uphold the rule of law, democratic principles, rights and universal values.

4. To support a government and administration that is:
- transparent and accountable,
- truly competent and efficient,
- free of corruption and cronyism,
- clean and honest,
- fair and trustworthy,
that will be fully able to serve its functions and meet its responsibilities, freely and fairly. An administration that will always be mindful of the rights and interests of the people in whose name and cause it is appointed to serve.

5. To promote the socioeconomic well-being of the people, so that all Malaysians may enjoy truly advanced, progressive, fair and equitable lives — individually upholding filial piety and other noble values and collectively joined together in sincere family kinship as members of our national community and as stakeholders in our common national destiny.

6. To support an economic policy that will help achieve and sustain a high standard of living for the people, based on the principle of justice, fairness and balance, consistent with the constitution and under a stable monetary condition.

Yours sincerely,
Wan Saiful Wan Jan
Amanah Central Committee Member

Filed under: Freedom & Liberty, Malaysia

Sang Pencerah – a story of the founder of Muhammadiyah

In a phone conversation with Dr Asri Zainal Abidin yesterday afternoon, he suggested that I watch ‘Sang Pencerah”. I did so last night.

This turned out to be a beautiful movie about Kiyai Haji Dahlan, founder of the reformist movement Muhammadiyah, advocate of ijtihad and knowledge-based reasoning, campaigner against blind-following and blind-obedience of religious scholars.

Best quote: When a group of would-be students said that usually they learn merely by listening to what the teacher says, Ahmad Dahlan said: “Jadi yang pintar hanya guru ngajinya? Muridnya hanya mengikuti gurunya? Pengajian di sini, kalian yang menentukan. Dimulai dari bertanya”. (minute 20.05)

Filed under: Freedom & Liberty, Personal

The structure of libertarian thought

Filed under: Freedom & Liberty

Disebalik kena buang daripada Harakah

(Nota tambahan 2 jam selepas komen ini ditulis: Oleh kerana dalam masa tak sampai dua jam komen ini telah mendapat sekitar 600 hits, saya rasa wajar saya menambah sedikit komen kecil. Para pembaca perlu ingat bahawa komen saya di bawah mungkin berat sebelah dan memihak kepada saya sahaja, kerana saya yang menulisnya. Untuk berlaku adil, para pembaca perlu memeriksa dahulu pandangan daripada para penama yang saya sebutkan dalam komen ini. Bagaimanapun, perbualan saya dengan Lutfi yang saya nukilkan di bawah adalah berdasarkan catatan saya yang hampir secara verbatim)

 

Kolum pertama saya dalam Harakah diterbitkan pada 26 November 2010, selepas saya berbincang dengan Ahmad Lutfi Othman, Ketua Pengarang akhbar itu pada 11 November 2010 (Klik di sini untuk membaca artikel pertama saya dalam kolum “Cabaran Idea”)

Nampaknya penglibatan saya dengan Harakah merupakan antara perkhidmatan yang paling pendek yang pernah saya lakukan.

Pada jam 7pm 18 Februari 2011, saya menerima SMS daripada Lutfi berbunyi “kolum saudara di harakah – ada masalah timbul, elok jumpa utk jelaskan hal ini.”

Saya membalas mengatakan perbualan telefon pun sudah mencukupi. Dan, pada jam 10.15pm malam yang sama, saya secara rasminya dibuang daripada menjadi kolumnis akhbar tersebut. (Klik di sini untuk membaca artikel terakhir kolum “Cabaran Idea”)

Sebenarnya saya tidak menerima satu sen pun daripada akhbar tersebut. Jadi mungkin lebih tepat jika dikatakan saya dibuang daripada kerja sukarela untuk akhbar PAS itu. Niat asal mahu membantu setakat terdaya, tapi akhirnya kena tendang pula!

Lutfi menerima arahan daripada Idris Ahmad, Ketua Penerangan PAS Pusat untuk menamatkan kolum saya. Saya dimaklumkan ada beberapa orang tidak bersetuju saya diberikan kolum tetap.

Semasa perbualan saya dengan Lutfi, kelihatan seolah-olah artikel saya yang disiarkan pada 7 Februari merupakan salah satu masalah utama (klik di sini).

Artikel itu menceritakan mengenai satu seminar anjuran IDEAS di UKM pada 25 Januari 2011, yang dirasmikan oleh Dato’ Saifuddin Abdullah. Artikel itu juga menyentuh satu lagi majlis anjuran IDEAS pada 8 Februari untuk menyambut ulang tahun kelahiran Almarhum Tunku Abdul Rahman dan juga ulang tahun pertama penubuhan IDEAS. Ada beberapa orang yang tidak senang hati apabila ada penulisan dalam Harakah yang memberi promosi kepada “program UMNO”.

Saya tidak pasti pula program mana yang mereka maksudkan sebagai “program UMNO”. Semua yang saya tulis adalah mengenai program IDEAS.

Tetapi, yang paling ironis ialah komentar oleh panelis majlis IDEAS pada 8 Februari telah dijadikan bahan muka depan Harakah minggu itu. Nampaknya apabila kita mempromosi program itu, maka ianya salah. Tetapi bila program itu ada “mata” yang boleh mereka gunakan untuk politik murahan, terhegeh-hegeh pula letak di muka depan!

Saya perlu jelaskan di sini bahawa perbualan 15 minit saya dengan Lutfi sebenarnya tidak dapat mengenalpasti secara tepat artikel mana yang menjadi puncanya atau jika ada mana-mana satu kesilapan dalam penulisan saya yang menjadi sebab utama. Ini kerana sebelum artikel bertarikh 7 Februari itu disiarkan, telah dua kali Idris Ahmad memberi wahyu kepada Harakah mengenai kolum saya.

Oleh kerana itu, kedua-dua kami, iaitu saya dan Lutfi, beranggapan bahawa wahyu daripada Idris Ahmad itu sebenarnya bukanlah kerana mana-mana perenggan tertentu, tetapi lebih disebabkan isu personaliti dan sejarah.

Sejarah itu bermula dengan penyertaan saya dalam Parti Konservatif Britain pada tahun 2005, semasa masih memegang jawatan Mursyid Al-Hizbul Islami UK & Eire (HIZBI). Sebagai Mursyid, saya mempengerusikan Majlis Syura Pusat HIZBI.

Beberapa orang ahli Majlis Syura pada waktu itu membantah penyertaan saya dalam Parti Konservatif kerana bagi mereka ini menimbulkan persoalan mengenai ke mana wala’ saya. Bagi mereka yang biasa dengan sistem dalam PAS, isu wala’ merupakan senjata utama parti untuk memastikan semua ahlinya mengikut sepenuhnya arahan orang atasan. Jika berlaku sesuatu bantahan, maka yang bersalah ialah mereka yang tidak wala’, dan si pemimpin pula biasanya selamat.

Dua orang yang amat berkeras membantah ialah Aminulraasyid Yatiban dan Raja Ahmad Iskandar Raja Yaacob. Sejak awal lagi mereka berbincang bagaimana untuk menyegerakan rombakan Majlis Syura supaya saya tidak lagi menjadi Mursyid.

Hasrat itu tercapai dalam mesyuarat Majlis Syura Pusat pada 8 April 2006 di Bewley Hotel, Manchester. Mesyuarat itu berakhir dengan Aminulraasyid berjaya mengambil alih jawatan Mursyid dengan sokongan kuat daripada Raja Ahmad Iskandar.

Mesyuarat itu juga dimaklumkan bahawa rupanya kedua-dua mereka telah terlebih dahulu menghubungi beberapa orang pemimpin PAS di Malaysia untuk mendapatkan sokongan. Aminulraasyid telah menghubungi Haron Taib dan Raja Ahmad Iskandar telah menghubungi Ketua Dewan Pemuda Pas Pusat Salahudin Ayub. Pada waktu itu Idris Ahmad ialah Timbalan Ketua Dewan Pemuda PAS Pusat.

Sehingga hari ini saya berpegang dengan pendapat bahawa mereka yang berada di luar negara bebas menyertai mana-mana pertubuhan yang mereka mahu. PAS tidak relevan dalam membuat keputusan mengenai hal sebegitu.

Tetapi jelas sekali golongan yang berpegang dengan fikrah kolektivisme amat kuat dalam PAS sehingga sebarang tindakan yang berbentuk individu boleh dihalang terus atas alasan “tidak wala’ ”. Mereka memang tidak berpuas hati apabila saya membantah keputusan mereka.

Inilah punca asal masalah yang menyumbang kepada penamatan kolum saya dalam Harakah. Nampaknya dendam itu berterusan sehingga sekarang!

Saya memang telah memaklumkan kepada Lutfi mengenai kemungkinan dendam itu akan timbul kembali jika saya diberikan kolum tetap. Tetapi Lutfi sebagai seorang gentleman berkata bahawa kita patut cuba dahulu.

Sehingga saat ini saya terus menghormati Lutfi sebagai seorang editor yang berprinsip. Masalahnya ialah dia bekerja di bawah indvidu-individu yang mempunyai kepentingan politik, sehingga kebebasan beliau terkongkong. Saya juga tidak mahu menyusahkan beliau kerana kesihatan beliau yang sedang terganggu, maka sebab itulah apabila beliau memaklumkan wahyu Idris Ahmad itu, saya tidak membantah langsung.

Pada peringkat awalnya, beliau ada menasihatkan agar saya tidak menulis perkara yang sensitif bagi PAS. Tetapi saya bertegas bahawa mereka tersalah jika menyangka bahawa saya akan menulis mengenai kebaikan Pas dan keburukan UMNO setiap masa. PAS bukan malaikat dan UMNO bukan iblis. Kedua-duanya ada kebaikan dan keburukan. Maka setiap kebaikan perlu dipuji dan keburukan perlu diperbaiki.

Pemberhentian ini menunjukkan masih ada yang tidak senang apabila ada orang yang mengatakan bahawa PAS tidak maksum.

Serba sedikit saya gusar juga apa yang akan berlaku terhadap kebebasan akhbar dan kebebasan bersuara di Malaysia jika individu-individu seperti beberapa kerat pemimpin PAS ini mengambil alih tampuk pemerintahan negara. Adakah mereka akan memberi kebebasan hanya bagi kaki ampu sahaja tetapi membunuh sesiapa yang tidak bersetuju dengan mereka?

Saya sebelum ini pernah mempunyai kolum dalam Utusan Malaysia yang bernama “Wau Bebas”. Tetapi saya berhenti menulis untuk Utusan kerana saya tidak gembira dengan nada editorial yang mereka gunakan. Bezanya, di Utusan, mereka hanya mengedit perenggan-perenggan yang mereka tidak suka. Jika ada artikel saya yang terlalu sensitif, maka mereka tidak menerbitkannya. Tetapi mereka tidak pula menamatkan kolum saya. Saya yang berhenti sendiri.

Sebaliknya, dalam akhbar Harakah milik parti “Islam” pula, apabila mereka tidak bersetuju, maka mereka terus bunuh! Nampaknya perbezaan antara PAS dan UMNO kini menjadi semakin ketara.

Filed under: Freedom & Liberty, Malaysia, Personal,

Who is John Galt?

The long awaited movie is coming soon!

Check out the movie’s website and read more about the book.

 

Filed under: Freedom & Liberty

Islam and capitalism

Mustafa Akyol delivers another brilliant lecture

PFS 2010 – Mustafa Akyol, Are Islam and Capitalism Compatible? from Sean Gabb on Vimeo.

Filed under: Freedom & Liberty

School improvement: should we go Dutch?

(A version of this was published in The Edge, 8 January 2011)

Several parents contacted me to share their stories after reading my article last month. There is one common thread to all the stories. Parents want the best for their children and they feel that private schools are better. But they don’t have the money to pay private school fees. I can fully understand how frustrating it is, because that is also my personal experience.

Let’s make one thing clear. I am in no way suggesting that all private schools are good by default. But there are at least two forces that push private schools to continuously improve – the forces of competition and decentralisation.

Private schools must compete for paying clients. The only way they can “defeat” their rivals – other private schools and taxpayer-funded state schools – is by ensuring their students perform better. State schools will survive no matter how they perform. In contrast, private schools that perform badly will head towards certain death because parents will exercise their choice and opt for a better one.

On the other hand, the management of private schools is certainly more decentralised. They have more freedom to innovate and improvise. This liberty empowers teachers and school managers to do what is best for their students, not simply following directives from politicians and Putrajaya overlords. A recent report by McKinsey published in November 2010 argues that decentralisation, including in pedagogical issues, is an important feature of a school that is moving towards excellence.

But there remains the problem of affordability. The key therefore is to introduce competition (and the parental choice that comes with it) and decentralisation while keeping schools free. To me this is still a compromise because total privatisation would be the best way. But it is a very good and most acceptable compromise for now.

The central principle is that taxpayers’ money should follow students. The voucher system is among the best options. We must develop one that is suited for our country.

School vouchers is not a new system. Andrew Coulson, Director of Cato Institute’s Center for Educational Freedom, suggested that the earliest explicit description of the idea can be found in Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nation, first published in 1776. More recently, in 2005 Reason Magazine called Nobel Prize winner Milton Friedman as the Father of Modern School Reform. Until his death in 2006, Friedman tirelessly campaigned for the voucher system, believing that education subsidies, if it were to continue, must be targeted at consumers and not suppliers.

Thanks to funding from the Dutch government, I was able to visit Holland in November 2010, partly to look at the Dutch school system. Dutch parents have enjoyed the benefits of school voucher and choice since 1917. Educational freedom is in fact enshrined in the Dutch constitution.

Dutch schools are government-funded, yet approximately 70 per cent of schools are private. All schools, including private schools, receive full government funding based on student numbers and manpower needs. Schools do not charge top-up fees, thus ensuring that all schools remain essentially free. But parents can donate for additional activities.

When I met Dr Frans van Noort, the principal of St Gregorius College, a religious secondary school in Utrecht, he explained that teachers and administrative staff (including himself) are employed by the school itself. They are not government employees the way our Malaysian teachers are employed. This gives the school management full ability to reward and sanction teachers and staff based on their performance in nurturing students.

I also met Ton Duif, head of AVS, the trade union for school leaders. He fiercely defended the independence of schools, arguing that he would never allow government to interfere unnecessarily in the terms and conditions of service of school leaders that are his members. It must have been the first time I had a face-to-face meeting with a trade union head arguing against government intervention, out of conviction that employers are partners, not the enemy.

Having spoken to a few groups of Dutch schoolchildren, at a cursory glance, I must say that if we compare them with Malaysian students at the same age group, they are more mature in their thinking. Nevertheless my personal observation is limited and cannot be taken as the benchmark. For that, we need to refer to TIMSS and PISA, the two global education assessments schemes usually used for international benchmarking. Holland consistently performs very well in both.

The Dutch system is an example of how choice, competition and decentralisation created by the voucher system benefit students. Commenting on the Dutch system, a World Bank report entitled The Role and Impact of Public-Private Partnerships in Education published in 2009 says “the system is not only successful academically but is also cost effective, yielding good results at relatively low cost”. In other words, it works.

It is time for those who believe education is a public good and cannot be run by the private sector or be privatised to ask themselves how much longer they want to allow their false belief to trump our children’s education attainment. It is wrong to place this mistaken ideology over and above the rights of our children to receive excellent quality education.


More articles can be found on www.IDEAS.org.my and www.AkademiMerdeka.org

Filed under: Articles, Freedom & Liberty, Malaysia

Perak: a state of crisis

The LoyarBurok.com team launched their first book today, entitled “Perak: a state of crisis”. I wrote the Foreword for the book. Dato Seri Nizar, former MB of Perak, gave a speech to officiate the launch.

It was a brilliant event. There was one capitalism-bashing statement, which I thought was completely out of context but forgiveable because the ignorance was so obvious. For example, in one of the readings it was said that Perak was “robbed by the capitalists and the monarchy”, obviously ignorant of the fact that capitalists would avoid being part of state apparatus out of their commitment to the principle of limited state.

 

Cover of “Perak: a state of crisis”

Filed under: Freedom & Liberty, Malaysia, Politics

Tatler August 2010

TRAVERSING INTO THE PAST (source: Tatler website)

Malaysia history tells the tale of THREE VISIONARY LEADERS who fought long and hard to seek freedom for our beloved nation. Lily Ong examines how the evergreen values upheld by these leaders resonate with the Post-Independence generation of today

 It was August 31, 1957. Dataran Merdeka reverberated with the echoes of joy and triumph, as the people of Malaya celebrated their independence. It was a moment the people of Malaya had waited for, culminated after approximately 446 years ever since the Portuguese colonised the Sultanate of Malacca. It was a moment that transcended race, gender or even religion. It was the turning point in our history, which paved the way to the nation we are today. The thrice resounding call of ‘Merdeka’ into the air led by a man who worked tirelessly for this success, followed by the jubilant cheers of the people, will forever be etched in the minds of those who were present in that historic moment. Ever since then, our country has developed by leaps and bounds into a modern one befitting the 21st century.

There is no stopping Malaysia as it continues to bulldoze its way into being a full-fledged developed country – whether it’s in the arena of economy, sports or even human capital. However, a question arises from this surge of development – is modern science and technology the only key to a golden future? What about the people of our country, who will be the driving force of our nation’s growth? What are the core traits or values that constitute a true citizen of Malaysia? To answer these questions, Malaysia Tatler looks back into the past to seek inspiration from the three national heroes who have shaped the foundation of our nation with their hard work and core values. Through the eyes of seven individuals from the post-Merdeka generation, we rediscover the meaning of being a true citizen of our nation.   

 TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN PUTRA AL-HAJ 
A hero, the people’s leader, the man who led Malaya to Indepen-dence, the first Prime Minister of the Federation of Malaya – these are the words we use to honour Tunku Abdul Rahman. Although it has been 53 years since the independence of our nation, the memories and images of Tunku are timelessly preserved in history books, read by school children and adults alike.  

However, despite all these efforts to honour Tunku, there is very little understanding of the ideological battles he encountered to advocate independence for the nation. The value of honouring Tunku’s memory today emphasises more on his achievements, but less on his beliefs, principles and vision of justice and fairness for the people of Malaysia. Three men with varying political beliefs aspire to bring the focus back to our founding father’s vision for our nation.   

Wan Saiful Wan Jan, Tunku Zain Al-‘Abidin Tuanku Muhriz, and Wan Mohd Firdaus are three friends who were working in London. “I had been having separate conversations with Tunku Abidin and Firdaus about the need for an independent think-tank promoting classical liberal and libertarian ideas since 2004. Things came together in 2006 when we first registered Malaysia Think Tank in London with the purpose of looking at libertarian ideas in the uk and localising those ideas for Malaysia,” says Wan Saiful Wan Jan, a smart and jovial gentleman with a sincere grin that will endear him to any who enter into a conversation with him.   

Fast forward to early 2010, the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS) was successfully launched in the presence of three generations of Tunku Abdul Rahman’s family, including his daughter, Tunku Datuk Datin Paduka Khadijah, and great-granddaughter Sharyn Shufiyan who spoke at the event. ideas is Malaysia’s first independent cross-partisan free market think-tank – supported by notable personalities in the country such as historian Professor Emeritus Khoo Kay Kim and a cross-party advisory group comprising both Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat members. Tunku Abidin, who is the second son of Negeri Sembilan’s Yang DiPertuan Besar Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir, serves as Founding President, while Wan Saiful is the Founding Chief Executive and Wan Mohd Firdaus serves as the Founding Director for this non-profit organisation.   

Despite the differences in their political leanings and beliefs, the three men stand united under the powerful idea of democracy and freedom. IDEAS is inspired by the vision of Tunku Abdul Rahman, who stated in the 1957 Proclamation of Independence that Malaysia should “be forever a sovereign democratic and independent State founded upon the principles of liberty and justice and ever seeking the welfare and happiness of its people and the maintenance of a just peace among all nations.” Tunku, who was always pragmatic, believed in the importance of justice and liberty for his people and led his cabinet to empower the people of the nation. ”Tunku Abdul Rahman was the Winston Churchill, Margaret Thatcher and Boris Johnson of our nation all rolled into one – a statesman, a great reformer and a jovial gentleman,” says the tall, refined and bespectacled Tunku Abidin with a piercing gaze that speaks volumes about his high intelligence. “He was true to himself and did not hide his weaknesses – qualities rare in a leader these days.”  

Wan Mohd Firdaus, a polished young man with a penchant for economics and history, also believes that Tunku achieved independence for Malaya because the British understood and saw Tunku’s vision for an independent Malaya. “Tunku understood Malaya like no other. He might have been of royal descent, but he understood the poor and their needs. He was keen on helping the Malays, but he knew that good law-abiding non-Malay citizens would have an equal say in this new country,” he notes.  

The logo chosen by the founding members of ideas is in the shape of a wau bulan, a metaphor for the kite of freedom. “Malaysians are born free but there are many interventions in our liberty to live the way we choose. We need to bring back Tunku Abdul Rahman’s love of freedom to our country,” opines Wan Saiful.  

Wan Mohd Firdaus states that he believes one of Tunku Abdul Rahman’s enduring yet admirable traits was his empathy towards all races, religions, classes and political divides. “He was accepted by all his people. He achieved this because he understood that Malaysia belongs to all Malaysians and he believes that the Malaysian dream is attainable for all,” he says passionately.  

Today, IDEAS carries out research, holds lectures, has some publications and gives suggestions on promoting and educating the public about market-based solutions for public policy reforms and changes. The three founding members are optimistic about pioneering change in Malaysia and upholding Tunku Abdul Rahman’s strong vision for the nation. They involve themselves in the operations of IDEAS as much as they can, writing articles and giving speeches or lectures whenever necessary.   

As we strive to move forward as a nation towards the future, perhaps we should look back and explore the values upheld by the man who successfully procured independence for the country he loved. “Many people think that moving forward requires brand new philosophies, slogans or visions. But I think Tunku Abdul Rahman himself laid much of the groundwork for our nation. Most of our people, not the least some of our leaders, seem to have forgotten the hard work of their predecessors,” says Tunku Abidin. To learn more about ideas, log onto www.ideas.org.my.  

TUN TAN CHENG LOCK 
Tun Tan Cheng Lock learnt at a very young age the importance of hard work in order to achieve his dreams. Although his grandfather, Tan Choon Bock, was wealthy, he tied up his assets in a family trust that lasted 84 years after his death. As a young man, Tun Tan Cheng Lock failed to obtain a scholarship to study law and was forced to become a teacher at Raffles Institution in Singapore. Realising he was unsuited to teaching, his mother, Lee Seck Bin, suggested he try rubber planting. He took his mother’s advice and returned to Malacca to work in a rubber estate. He was successful as a planter and in April 1910, together with some business associates, Tun Tan Cheng Lock established the United Malacca Rubber Estate, which has just celebrated its 100th anniversary. However, it was not his admirable business acumen that made Tun Tan Cheng Lock famous. Although he had a cordial relationship with the British, he was deeply influenced by the Indian Congress Party’s fight for Independence in the 1940s. After the end of the Japanese Occupation in Malaya, Tun Tan left India and returned to Malaya and in February 1949, he founded the Malayan Chinese Association (MCA) and history was forever changed. He worked side by side with Tunku Abdul Rahman to ensure independence for the people of Malaya, and fought for the rights of the Malaysian Chinese community. Unity was a priority for Tun Tan and he worked hard to integrate the Chinese and Indian communities with Malay society.   

Ng Ming Shern and Phang Kin Hoong are two great-grandsons of Tun Tan Cheng Lock. Eloquent and charming, Ming Shern possesses a razor-sharp wit and a jovial sense of humour that reflects his easygoing personality. Kin Hoong is the older and more serious of the two, but once he lets his guard down, he will liven up the conversation with his quicksilver smile and cheerful laughter. Kin Hoong is an investment analyst while Ming Shern works as a management consultant for a global consulting company.  

Tun Tan Cheng Lock’s granddaughter Tan Siok Choo once revealed in an interview that her grandfather used to read books on Chinese literature, philosophy and poetry. Her nephew Ming Shern shares another story about the visionary founder of MCA: “He made his children memorise a Chinese poem that included the following verse: If wrong you do, If false you play, In summer among the flowers, You will atone, You will repay, In winter among the showers.”Kin Hoong and Ming Shern have never met their great-grandfather as Tun Tan Cheng Lock passed away before they were born. But these two young men have been regaled with tales about him and have developed much respect for the heroic figure who now lives on in history books. “I was told again and again how he was a natural leader. He was responsible, caring and believed in integrity and justice,” reflects Kin Hoong. His cousin, Ming Shern wholeheartedly agrees, “A common story that I heard about him is how he espoused the merits of hard work and integrity – he often said ‘Honest living, however menial the work, is not to be despised.’” His emphasis on integrity and his staunch belief in Confucius are two of his distinguishing traits that set him apart from the worldwide politicians of today who dominate the news headlines with allegations of their corruption and wayward policies.  

Although Kin Hoong lauds the government’s efforts to honour our nation’s founding fathers, he suggests that we look deeper into what they are recognised for: “I think it is good the heroes of old are recognised, not only for their contributions but what these heroes symbolise. When you think about it, our founding fathers were people of different races and backgrounds who came together with one mission – to achieve independence for our country.”  

Tun Tan Cheng Lock, like his close friend Tunku Abdul Rahman, envisioned Malaysia as a country united under the same patriotic spirit. “He had a multiracial outlook and he believed that we should accept each other, regardless of our race, culture and religion. That was why he fought so hard to ensure there is fairness for all,” says Kin Hoong.  

According to Heng Pek Koon’s book Chinese Politics in Malaysia – A History of the MCA, if Tun Tan Cheng Lock and his son Tun Tan Siew Sin did not fight for the legal principle of jus soli, over three-quarters of the Malaysian Chinese population would have been denied citizenship. “He fought against injustice in our nation, for all Malayans and not only for his own race. Prior to independence, he worked tirelessly and tried to improve the lives of the less fortunate like the “Mui Tsai” (slave girls), Indian chettiars and poor Malay fishermen,” adds Ming Shern. “His steadfast integrity, wisdom and dedication to the people are definitely traits that should be emulated by the new generation today, as we do.”   

TUN VT SAMBANTHAN 
Before Tun VT Sambanthan put his daughter, Deva Kunjari Sengamalam to bed, he would tell her stories based on a land ruled by a Lion King called ‘Veera Raja Singam’ or Heroic King Lion in English. “In his stories, peace always prevailed among humans and animals. He told me tales of how two little girls are welcomed in the jungle where this King ruled, and where a lamb and a tiger walked together side by side. He related the stories to economy, science and international peace – such as how the bees will cross-pollinate the crops for better yields, or how the King invited scientists to work on his land to develop a bomb neutraliser,” says Kunjari as she is better known among her family and friends. No doubt, these anecdotes aptly reflect the fifth elected president of the Malayan Indian Congress (MIC) during our independence period. Born and raised in Sungai Siput, Perak, Tun VT Sambanthan studied in India, where the Indian nationalistic movement sparked his political and social curiosity. This gentle leader firmly subscribed to the Gandhian philosophy of non-violence – a philosophy he embraced until his passing in 1979. When he returned to Malaya, not only did he take up the mantle at his father’s estate, he worked hard to improve the lives of the Indian community, his main interest being education, before his rise to the helm of MIC.  

Kunjari, who works as a partner in a legal firm, has the same warm eyes just like her father as well as his youthful disposition. She also inherited her mother, Toh Puan Umasundari Sambanthan’s smile – a smile that radiates compassion and sincerity with the curve of her lips. Like her parents, Kunjari is soft-spoken and articulate.   

When Tun VT Sambanthan became the President of MIC, he faced the difficult task of strengthening the party while consolidating its position in the UMNO-MCA-MIC Alliance. He worked tirelessly with Tunku Abdul Rahman to procure independence from the British. After independence was won, he served as the Minister of Labour, Minister of Health, Works, Posts and Telecommunications and finally as the Minister of National Unity. He also attended to his duties as President of MIC faithfully. “He came into politics as the leader of an impoverished minority at that point. The first major problem that confronted him was the issue of fragmentation – where estates were being cut up and being sold. There were no legislations in place to protect the estate workers,” says Kunjari.  

In 1960, he founded the National Land Finance Cooperative Society (NLFCS) as a means to enable the worker to acquire a share in the plantations at a cost of $100 per share, payable by monthly instalments of $10. “He managed to work closely with sympathetic bankers to mobilise estates in which they worked and thus, determine their own destiny. Through this, he managed to provide educational opportunities for the children of the members,” adds Kunjari about the contributions of Tun VT Sambanthan for his community. “He successfully mobilised the labourer community into a powerful economic force. He made a downtrodden group at the time believe in themselves when no one did.” Consistent with his belief in a multiracial nation, he opened the membership for the Co-op to non-Indians as well.Despite his preference for a dhoti as an attire of choice, Tun VT Sambanthan tirelessly worked to serve Malayans as dutifully as he did for his Indian community. “He loved our country and its people very dearly. He was not bigoted or narrow-minded. He held himself as a Malaysian first and foremost although he instilled in his community the pride of an Indian heritage, language, philosophy and culture,” says Kunjari passionately. If there is one trait Kunjari admired most about her father, it was his humility. She related how his personality and character remained unaffected by his position and status as a minister, leader and close friend of Tunku. “To quote Rudyard Kipling, my father had an ‘ability to walk with kings and not lose the common touch’. He was known to be comfortable with all levels of society – whether seated on the ground with an estate worker or in a palace setting. He could converse with people from different backgrounds due to being well-read and informed on different topics,” she shares proudly.  

 Kunjari also relates that her father was always hardworking in everything he did, which gained the respect of his fellow leaders. “Tunku Abdul Rahman respected my father’s commitment in getting things done – such as the Parliament House and the National Monument, which was carried out by my father. I suspect that after some time, the bond between Tunku, my father and the late Tun Tan Siew Sin was so strong that they related to the Alliance as being a party rather than a coalition of three,” she says with conviction.  

Kunjari considers her parents, especially her father, as her inspiration. “He taught me that I should not be narrow-minded or judgmental. I try at all times to be Malaysian, embrace everyone as they are, and I am aware it is important that we grow together collectively as Malaysians,” she reveals candidly. Just like her father, who believed that every problem has a solution, Kunjari tries her best to come up with solutions for whatever challenges that come her way or for those who seek her advice – legal or not.  

If she had one more day with her late father, she shares that she will sit at his feet – a position she loved when talking to him – and ask him about the reason why he chose to walk down the path he did: “I would like to know how he maintained good cheer even at the worst moments of political strife and during all forms of treachery that he went through.”

Filed under: Freedom & Liberty, Malaysia, Personal

Of New Economic Model

IDEAS released our response to the New Economic Model proposal this week.

To access the full response, and to view TV coverage of it, please click here.

Filed under: Freedom & Liberty, Malaysia, Politics

Pages

Twitter Updates

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.