Met with Datuk Kamal Amir at Hilton Metropole today. I have never met him before. Apparently he writes a lot, including in Malaysia Today. But because I have not been following his writing, I wasn’t sure what to expect.
Well….. my main conclusion is, we see Malaysia with two different perspectives.
I believe the so called ‘social contract’ can be, and should be, re-negotiated. After all, it is not even a written contract, and, in the absence of a written text, anybody can make any claim as to what the social contract is. But Datuk Kamal strongly defends the social contract.
I see Malaysia as belonging to each and every citizen, equally. Datuk Kamal agrees, but at the same time, argues that Bumiputras are the sons of the soil and therefore their (or, should I say, our?) special previleges must be protected.
I am not that bothered about language, and whether or not people speak Malay. But to Datuk Kamal, language is the basis of culture and civilisation.
I try not to concern myself too much as to which party governs Malaysia so long as they respect the rule of law and freedom of citizens. But Datuk Kamal vehemently defended Barisan Nasional (although he is also vehemently against Abdullah Badawi)
I can understand where he is coming from. As an ethnic minority myself (in Britain, that is), I believe it is imperative for everyone in this country to integrate into the wider society. He believes that Malays are the son of the soil and therefore, just like the second and third generation ethnic minority in Britain has to adapt to life in Britain, ethnic minority in Malaysia has to adapt too.
It didn’t even cross my mind to call for the British government to switch from English to Malay. Rather, it is I who have to learn English. On the same logic, as Bahasa Kebangsaan, Bahasa Melayu should be the main language of the land and everybody must be able to converse fluently in Malay.
And, as a Conservative, I would defend Conservative values. Similarly, as an UMNO supporter, he defends UMNO.
Nevertheless, the one thing you cannot deny is that he has lots of information in his hands. He was very strong in his criticism against Abdullah Badawi, and he cited specific cases to explain his case. He also accepted that we don’t really have anyone else to hold the top post (the one person he named, we agreed, do not have the necessary support-base to become PM). Anwar Ibrahim caused him great frustration. And PAS….. well, let’s not even get there.
But my key point is, he has his arguments and he was not talking empty. Almost every single thing he raised to me in our short meeting was backed my sound arguments. We may have different perspectives, but I only have respect for those who use intellect rather than emotion.
Looks like I will be adding Datuk Kamal’s writings into my reading list!
Filed under: Malaysia, Politics
Recent Comments